I like the grammar and spelling, but I am very ignorant on the subject. When there is a misuse of a word, try to understand the reason but simply (as I believe it should be). The reason for this blog is to try to explain (yes, myself and who would be helpful) some rules but as informative as possible.
The following paragraph is the answer I gave on WordReference Forums regarding the proper use of the gerund in two examples that are checked. It is not necessary to read it all, try to understand what he says is a task, it seems, exclusive of Nuclear Engineering Language:
"In both examples, the gerunds are predictive of the subject. In the first case the subject of greet (name) in the second subject is (name). In both cases has a specific function, the adjective (the predicates function as attributes but with full verbs semantically, not empty as copula. nominal verb forms are two-faced on one side are nominal elements: a noun infinitive male (in languages \u200b\u200bthat have gender-neutral is neutral), the gerund adjective invariable in gender and number and the participle an adjective to change gender and number. Yet they are verbs and the infinitive supports aspectual difference and voice : be done and have been done ( liabilities) to and have done ( assets); do / be done and have done / have been made of aspect, imperfect the first (which conleva the expression of times of present, future and past imperfect) and perfect seconds ( which leads to the expression of times past perfect). Furthermore, as verbs can be nuclei of verb phrases, phrases or sentences with the addition or attributes that suit their status as copular, intransitive or transitive active or passive. As for the verbal adjectives, which is what concerns us here, the gerund is active and imperfect and reflects the values \u200b\u200bof the present participle, gerund and gerundés of Latinos, the passive participle is perfect and gives the values \u200b\u200bof the past participle of Latin Pasic. Often the emancipation of lexical adjectives of these participles, from the Latin (adjectives in-ado,-edo,-ido, very large and whose list is not closed), the god gerun emancipate the verbal paradigm, not substantivizan , but were emancipated present participles, and disappeared in MS-ante,-ente,-inte adjectival suffixes still alive. the aspect of syntactic behavior, the subject is the substantive core that is consistent with (participle) or referred to (gerund). Depending on the nature copula (is), intransitive or transitive active or passive, accept or not certain supplements, attributes or predicates of the subject or direct object. The gerund is very common to find an adjective syntactic subject with intransitive verbs or transitive direct object active. It is also often used as a nucleus adjacent mere noun, like any other adjective. The participle in their looks and morphemes like many adjectives, no major difficulties. The participle of the paradigmatic forms of the perfect time is merely a free lexeme. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment